Even as GHPs gain increasing recognition as an energy- and cost-saving heating and air conditioning alternative, highly variable state and local policies governing water wells is posing a significant barrier to their more widespread adoption. It’s a growing problem that is getting bigger.
It had to happen, because it always does. As soon as a new technology is found to be in demand and growing, leave it to government to step in and complicate things. Here's an editorial by Douglas Dougherty, president and CEO of the Geothermal Exchange Organization, on a development that's put a kink in the expansion of geothermal.
-- Terry McIver, Executive Editor.
The geothermal heat pump (GHP) industry prides itself on offering an efficient, environmentally friendly technology for satisfying the thermal loads of buildings. To do so, a GHP system relies on circulating water through pipes placed underground (either vertically or horizontally) to tap the natural heat retained by the earth.
GHP technologies offer significant environmental benefits. Buildings consume more energy than any other sector of the economy. Over 17% of U.S. Primary Energy Consumption serves the thermal loads of buildings for heating, cooling and hot water production. By drastically reducing these loads with renewable energy from the earth, GHPs mitigate the need for new power plants, lessen the strain on the transmission grid, reduce carbon emissions and improve indoor air quality. And GHPs save money, too!
Many government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, recognize and even promote the economic, efficiency and environmental benefits of GHPs. And that recognition is mirrored by state energy and efficiency standards across the country.
Water Well Policies Hinder GHP Sales
Yet even as GHPs gain increasing recognition as an energy- and cost-saving heating and air conditioning alternative, highly variable state and local policies governing water wells is posing a significant barrier to their more widespread adoption. It’s a growing problem that is getting bigger.
It’s when policy makers add geothermal boreholes to a law that deals with
water wells that we run into siting problems at state and local levels.
But in some states and localities, policy makers have patched regulations governing geothermal boreholes into existing policies for water wells. In doing so, regulators fail to recognize that even though geothermal boreholes are drilled into the earth, their final installation is not at all like a water well.
According to a National Ground Water Association industry survey in 2009, some 80% of the states regulate boreholes drilled for vertical, closed loop geothermal heat exchangers under their water well codes.
When this happens, the resulting rules create an unnecessary barrier to GHP deployment. Closed-loop geothermal boreholes may be subjected to unrealistic setbacks from water lines, sewers and septic systems. Especially in urban areas, overly restrictive setbacks of 50 feet or more kill GHP sales and installations by eliminating the possibility of installing closed loop geothermal heat exchangers on residential and even commercial lots.
For example, Illinois lawmakers recently redefined a closed-loop geothermal borehole as a “closed loop well” in the state water well code. The result is new proposed regulations demanding egregious setbacks for geothermal boreholes that in many cases will preclude GHP system installations. And in California, state water law defines a geothermal borehole as a “geothermal heat exchange well,” which subjects them to similar unrealistic demands.
Too many policy makers have redefined vertical closed-loop heat exchangers linked to residential, commercial and institutional GHP systems as “wells.” This forces them to make geothermal boreholes “fit” into existing regulations governing water wells and safe drinking water. It’s the proverbial problem of a square peg in a round hole.
The goals of water well regulations are well-intentioned. They are meant to ensure sanitary drinking water for human health and to protect the environment (groundwater) from potential contamination—not to kill energy efficient technologies. But in the process, policy makers sometimes fail to grasp the essential differences between water wells and vertical boreholes for closed loop geothermal heat exchangers.
Water Wells vs. Geothermal Closed-Loop Boreholes
The word “well” comes from the Anglo Saxon “wellan” meaning to bubble, to well up. Webster’s New World Dictionary defines a well as “a flow of water from the earth”; “a deep hole or shaft sunk into the earth to tap an underground supply of water….”
A vertical closed-loop geothermal heat exchanger, on the other hand, consists of the borehole, polyethylene pipe that circulates water to and from the geothermal heat pump, and an extremely low-permeability sealant called grout that surrounds the pipe to the walls of the borehole.
GHP drillers and loop installers pay close attention to potential pollution sources and to subsurface geologic and hydrologic conditions before siting boreholes. In all cases, underground water formations are sealed off to prevent cross-contamination with water bearing zones.
Boreholes for closed loop heat exchangers require grout to fill the space between the heat exchanger pipe and walls of the hole. The most common grout is bentonite clay mixed with sand and potable water to prevent contamination. When drilling and placement of the heat exchanger system are completed, the grout is pumped into the borehole through a temporary “tremie” pipe, filling it from the bottom to the surface.
Unlike water wells, no portion of a closed loop geothermal borehole is constructed or finished with a residual open space. The entire borehole column is completely filled with a flexible, nearly impermeable grout that permanently seals the hole and heat exchanger from the groundwater environment. An added bonus is that the grout provides highly efficient thermal conductivity between the loop pipe and the surrounding earth.
Bentonite is impervious and retains many times its weight in moisture. In all but the most extreme conditions, it rarely dries out in the borehole. Thus the grout provides a self-sealing, low permeability barrier to groundwater intrusion. The grout fills in any cracks in the earth surrounding the borehole, essentially sealing it from intrusions of groundwater and not allowing pathways to groundwater along the length of the heat exchanger pipe.
The upshot is that a vertical geothermal heat exchanger comprised of a borehole, closed-circuit high-density polyethylene pipe, and a self-sealing, low permeability grout is not a well. Indeed, vertical geothermal boreholes have few similarities to water wells, except that they are drilled into the ground.
GHP Best Practices, Standards and Regulations
In too many cases, geothermal boreholes fall under all of the environmental rules—and especially setbacks—that are required of water wells. It’s when policy makers add geothermal boreholes to a law that deals with water wells that we run into siting problems at state and local levels.
The GHP industry prides itself on its economics and efficiency in heating and cooling and its environmental benefits of electricity, fuel and pollution savings. The last thing we want is the reputation of GHP closed loop installations sullied by unwarranted claims of potential groundwater contamination.
Broadly accepted Best Industry Practices for understanding site geology, grouting mixtures, and realistic setbacks from water and sewage facilities have evolved over the past 40 years. Properly grouted vertical geothermal heat exchangers appropriately distanced from water supplies as well as potential contamination sources are a mainstay of the GHP industry.
We have no problem with being fairly regulated. In fact, we welcome meaningful regulations because they set a standard to ensure that all drillers and installers of vertical geothermal heat exchangers are doing their jobs properly.
The Geothermal Exchange Organization (GEO) supports universal standards that the industry and various levels of government everywhere can agree upon. Such standards would foster sensible regulations regarding vertical boreholes for geothermal heat exchangers instead of the current patchwork of state and local rules that are often at odds with reality.
Partnering for Sensible Policy
GEO is now working with Canada (CSA Group), the National Ground Water Association (NGWA), the International Ground Source Heat Pump Association (IGSHPA), and the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) to create and implement a North American Standard for all facets of GHP installations.
We hope that when our work is finished, it will provide a realistic, universal standard that is acceptable to state and local governments—one that they can incorporate into their water protection codes, regulations and ordinances. Among other things, the standard will cover siting and installation of vertical geothermal heat exchangers. It will apply to new and retrofit installations in industrial, commercial, institutional and residential applications.
The adoption of a universal North American Standard coupled with sensible public policies for installation of vertical geothermal heat exchangers will be a market driver, not a market barrier. Not only will it provide a uniform and predictable code or geothermal borehole regulation across the country, it will raise the bar for loop field installers, who would be trained and certified to the standard.
And that is a win for everybody—from policy makers and geothermal installers, to more home and business owners who will enjoy the economy and comfort of GHPs. (GEO)
Sources: NGWA Guidelines for Construction of Loop Wells for Vertical Closed Loop Ground Source Heat Pump Systems, 2010, Third Edition, National Ground Water Association, and NGWA Geothermal heating and Cooling Systems State Regulatory Oversight Survey 2009-2010.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? ADD YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.